"The West Wing:" Aaron Sorkin’s Script for an Obama Presidency PDF E-mail
J. Kevin Ament   
Monday, 22 September 2008

 

President Bartlet of "The West Wing" appeared at last night’s 60th Anniversary Emmy Awards, delivering an eloquent, bipartisan reminder for audiences to vote in the upcoming Presidential election. During this presidential race, pundits have said much about the power of Barack Obama’s words to move crowds, but little about Sorkin’s, and how his idealized American President inspired voters to reconsider the qualities they demand in a candidate for the country’s highest office.

 

During four seasons with Sorkin at the helm of "The West Wing," (I will refrain from discussing the post-Sorkin downward writing spiral), Martin Sheen’s brilliant economics Ph.D. led with conviction, compassion and humor, quoting both scripture and statistics with ease, and delivering soaring oratory that on several occasions brought audiences to tears. He warned of the dangers of ignorance in government and glossy, ten-word talking points. He celebrated intellect, curiosity, nuance and service. Sound familiar?

 

With each failure of the current administration, fans of "The West Wing" longed for a Bartlet candidate. It was with Josiah Bartlet in mind that many Americans watched Obama’s keynote to the 2004 Democratic Convention, and his acceptance of the Democratic Nomination for President of the United States. Obama owes much to Sorkin for creating an ideal of what the Presidency and President could be, even in its bleakest days.

 

To read more articles by Kevin Ament, click here.



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (10)Add Comment
and Josh for VP!
written by Victor Kiriakis, Debate Moderator, September 22, 2008 02:39 PM
I might have to write "Josiah Barlet" on my ballot. I really agree with your thoughts here. The West Wing first made me give a damn about politics. Probably because I, like so many, desperately wanted to believe that we could have an administration like what Sorkin created. And the primaries were a casting call to fill the Bartlet role. Obama passed the screen test.

While we're on the subject, why in the hell didn't Sheen ever win an Emmy? Come on. Even after this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FScv89J6rro

Dream Land
written by Winger, September 22, 2008 04:31 PM
Yes, his Governor of Florida was a thinly-veiled Dubbya, and Bartlet trounced him in the debates. And yes, the dialog and speeches were stunning. That said, you're overlooking an obvious flaw in your argument: the voters reelected Bush in 2004, well past the show's glory days. If Sorkin convinced America in those first few magical seasons that smart, eloquent politicians were worth electing, why the second term for Bush? And why such a tight election now?

Also, let's not forget the fact that in the Bush/Gore and Bush/Kerry debates, the bar for Bush was set so low that the fact he didn't drool on himself meant victory to the American people. When Gore or Kerry beat up on him, people called them elitists. Fox was there to congratulate Bush as the victor after every debate, and Fox viewers were all too eager to parrot back the talking points. A true Bartlet presidency is only possible in a fictional America.
I dunno, Winger...
written by Kevin, September 22, 2008 05:01 PM
First, Kerry was hardly a "Bartlet candidate". His strength was who he wasn't, not who he was. As for the current race, Obama shares Bartlet's powerful oratory, but his relative inexperience creates enough anxiety among some to keep the race close.

I'm not saying Sorkin created some blueprint for the perfect president. Rather, Sorkin created contrast. Without the show, Americans would have simply seen failed politics on the nightly news and in the headlines. Failure is demoralizing. Instead, Sorkin showed what competent governance and inspirational leadership could look like. Seeing what's possible is the first step to feeling like one can make a difference. If there are better choices, the process of selecting is meaningful. If it's all the same crap, what's the point? Contrast is the first step toward hope. It's no surprise that these messages - participation and hope - are resonating with the American people this year. It's not enough to see what doesn't work. You have to see what does. Sorkin provided that, even if it was in a "dream land."
What about me?!
written by Paul Giamatti, September 22, 2008 05:13 PM
Don't forget the other president in the room last night. The John Adams miniseries on HBO provided just the contrast you describe in your post. I don't think HBO, Hanks or Spielberg realized how successful it would be. Intelligent, curious leaders created this country. If you haven't seen it, rent it.
...
written by Mary Phelan, September 23, 2008 11:11 AM
The sad thing about watching West Wing was having it end and coming back to the reality that President Bartlett was only fictional. But he did raise the bar for candidates; let's hope it sticks.
--Mary
West Wing Education
written by AMF, September 24, 2008 04:51 PM
My high school required that seniors take, and pass (with a D), a semester government course. I remember only two things from that class; the Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves, the 13th Amendment did (despite what our grade-school teachers said), and watching the West Wing. We watched a new episode almost daily. Is there a wonder Obama has the youth vote? Thank you Mr. Sorkin for showing the youth of America what a President can be.
Julius Caesar Lessons
written by English Teacher, September 25, 2008 02:26 PM
I use several Bartlett speeches, including the Joy Cometh in the Morning speech here, to supplement my teaching of Julius Caesar and rhetorical devices in my Freshman English classes. The repetition and parallel structures are incredible. I also have the text of the Joy Cometh speech on the door to my class. It's one of the reasons I became a teacher, and one of the reasons I'm voting for Obama. Lethargy and indifference are the poison pills to democracy. Inspirational leaders are one possible antidote.
straight talk part deux
written by tktm, September 29, 2008 04:19 PM
It will be interesting to see - given the current economic morass - where we end up this time around.
I believe we need, as a culture, to reconcile the notions of eloquence and straight talk and realize we can say important, substantial things without sacrificing soaring oratory and beautiful, nuanced, inspiring context and calls to action.

We need to feed both the belly and the soul in order to move ahead as a country.

Unfortunately we've set up a false dichotomy - the plain spoken everyman vs. the academic orator.

What we need now is not straight talk vs. change - but straight talk and change. The real power of strong communication and leadership.
Case in point
written by Kevin, September 29, 2008 08:29 PM
Truly wise, and beautifully said. I couldn't agree more.
Hmmmm.
written by Rapunzelpalooza, October 30, 2008 11:13 PM

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy