|
Mini’s SUV: Oxymoronic or Just Moronic? |
|
|
|
Bryan K. Oekel
|
|
Tuesday, 16 September 2008 |
|
First there was the Mini Clubman. Now this.
Et tu, Mini? Given
the fundamental market shifts of higher gas prices and heightened consumer concern
for the environment, adding another crossover SUV to an already crowded space
seems like an odd choice for the iconic car brand.
The awkwardly named and equally awkward looking not-so-mini
Clubman at least made a little sense to me.
But an SUV from a brand that re-launched itself in the U.S. by
proclaiming “let the revolution begin” and driving Ford Expeditions with Mini’s
on top of them? One built on ingenious
creative executions touting the diminutive nature of the car,
or its fuel efficiency long before it was the cool thing to do?
As subcompacts continue to grow in popularity and formidable
competition like the Scion, Yaris, Fit, super-sexy Fiat 500
and lust-worthy CR-Z
hit the scene, Mini will need the strongest brand possible. Crispin Porter + Bogusky helped build a
clear, compelling and powerful brand virtually overnight. Why dilute it by adding a ho-hum SUV to the
lineup?
Mini, stick with your brilliance. Leave the SUVs to the other guys. Slap a Bimmer badge on it and continue
perfecting the ultra-hip, too-cute car the world has come to know and
love.
|
Do not, I repeat, do not cross over.