But Mom...! PDF E-mail
Mindy M. Peirce   
Wednesday, 23 July 2008

 

A few weeks ago, I finally gave into my 7-year-old son’s request for a box of Reese’s Puffs (the chocolate/peanut butter/sugar crunch that is sure to start the day off right).  However, I was disturbed to find that a cereal clearly intended for children was advertising “The Dark Knight,” a movie that even before its release was said to be extremely dark and unfit for children.  Eerily, the cereal also contained a little figurine of The Joker, the mass-murdering character played by the late Heath Ledger.

 

Just weeks before this incident, I noticed “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” was heavily promoted with children’s products ranging from cereals to Lunchables to toys action figures.  After going through the grocery store and seeing Indiana Jones on everything, my son asked to go see the movie.  I had to explain that since it was rated PG-13 (as is “The Dark Knight”), he was too young to go see it, which (rightfully) confused him since it was on all of the products that he and his friends wanted.

 

This problem doesn’t just exist in the grocery aisles.  Commercials for movies like “Iron Man” and “The Incredible Hulk” ran on the Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon.  In fact, the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood has launched a campaign demanding that The Motion Picture Association of America stop marketing violent PG-13 films to young children. 

 

In response to criticism about this issue, Paramount Vice Chairman Rob Moore said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times, “Paramount has been and will continue to be committed t o advertising responsibly to children.  Our goal is to ensure parents have the information they need to make appropriate decisions and choices for their families.  So much so, our film advertising is reviewed by the Motion Picture Associate on America’s advertising bureau for the appropriateness of ads and ad placements, and we carefully select out promotional partners with whom we rely on to be equally sensitive to parental concerns.”

 

Of course, ultimately, it is up to parents to use their best judgment in deciding what movies their children are allowed to see.  But where does the responsibility lie when it comes to the actual marketing of violent films to young children?  The motion picture studios, like Paramount and Universal and Marvel Studios?  The Motion Picture Association of America?  Or the companies, like Burger King and Nickelodeon, who allow their brands to be used to promote these movies?



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (1)Add Comment
...
written by JP, July 23, 2008 04:02 PM
Having no children myself, I didn't realize that these movies were being promoted to children. But having seen The Dark Knight, I can understand the frustration of the author. Even I flinched during the movie, and although you don't necessarily "see" any blood or guts, it's certainly scary enough to give kids nightmares. If a movie is PG-13, I think it should only be marketed to kids 13 and up.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy