ABC Has The Right Idea, CW Is Scared To Death, And NBC Is Somewhere In The Middle PDF E-mail
Evan P Schneider   
Wednesday, 07 May 2008

 

I haven’t owned a TV in over five years and for that reason, I’m apparently television networks’ worst nightmare. Not because I don’t watch TV, though, because I do—it’s just that I watch it on the internet.

 

Getting out of college around the turn of the millennium, I was convinced the best thing on the air was The Simpsons, and I may have been right. To that end, I decided to give my TV set to my parents and swore off watching anything, especially the then-nascent wave of reality shows that followed suit behind MTV’s The Real World and proudly displayed common folk fighting with each other, usually battling it out for some cold hard cash.

 

But then something happened. TV got better, fast. And it got not just more entertaining, but more thoughtful and complex and compelling. In grad school, people were whispering about this show LOST and how incredible it was, and before that a guy at the local bar couldn’t stop talking about Arrested Development. I tried to hold out, vowing not to watch (upholding, therefore, a thinly veiled elitist attitude), but I couldn’t. These very smart people were talking about these shows and taking them very seriously, even the funny ones. Then The Office came along, and Project Runway, and I gave in. Big time.

 

Problem was, I still didn’t have a TV. So when I started binging, trying feverishly to catch up on all that I had missed, I turned, naturally, to the internet.

 

And what a stir that caused! One massive writers’ strike and some eight years later, LOST and The Office30 Rock stream their way into my apartment each week. But something’s missing and it’s name is CW. I’m hearing a lot about Gossip Girl and America’s Next Top Model, but I can’t tune in—CWTV decided to pull the plug on airing full episodes of their top shows because the internet was allegedly stealing TV viewers. and

 

This makes me wonder two things. First, isn’t a good thing if someone wants to watch your show and goes so far as to watch it online (the quality of web video is notoriously questionable, I should mention)? And second: who is to say that those people watching online aren’t also the same people watching the show on TV? Granted, I’m not one of them, but I’m guessing many people watch in both places. That’s what an addict does: s/he gets a fix as often as possible, however possible, and what’s a fan if not someone addicted to the stories the networks are telling and selling? And not giving an addict what s/he wants is rarely a good idea. In fact, it may be downright unsafe.

 

So, I’m willing to bet that this power move on CW’s part will prove to be a mistake. Consumers are busy people; they have crazy lives and want to be able to watch what they want to watch when they want to watch it, and if the network takes that freedom away, it’s going to be the network’s loss. Besides, there are plenty of shows available to choose from, many of which can be viewed entirely online, so it’s not a hard choice to make. Especially if a show counts on a viewer watching week after week to make sense of the story, it would seem in a network’s best interest to make that unbroken narrative available in some capacity. If they don’t, they’ll get viewers who give up because they can’t keep up.

 

ABC fully understands that their hit show LOST is intricate and sometimes difficult to follow, even for the connoisseur, and they have likewise made every single episode of every single season available online for free. Brilliant, I say. If someone wants to get involved at the urge of their friends and colleagues, it would seem smartest to allow them access to the whole story so they can get on board from the beginning. ABC, to boot, allows LOST to be purchased on iTunes, which I’ve been known to do because I’m a sucker for the new flash-forwards they’ve introduced. But, as is inevitable, not every network has caught on like ABC.

 

I’m tempted, for example, to get into Heroes, but alas, NBC won’t allow it, unless I netflix (which is a verb, now, I’m told, like “google”) the previous seasons, which I might do, but then I would still be behind since Heroes doesn’t have full current episodes online. Nor is The Office available to purchase on iTunes anymore, for whatever totally overwhelming bureaucratic reason. Playing hard to get is coy and effective in dating scenarios, but in TV land, it’s just plain dumb.

 

“Historically, the winners are the ones who embrace change,” said Jason Kilar, CEO of Hulu.com in a CNN interview. I couldn’t agree more. And though I realize there are a million tiny legal issues surrounding the airing of shows online, networks had better figure them all out as soon as possible if they’re going to make it in the new market where a television set is no longer necessary for watching television.

 

Needless to say, this is a deeply existential moment, therefore, for every major network. And Godspeed to them, I say!



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (1)Add Comment
...
written by bkostl, May 08, 2008 11:14 AM
My wife won't appreciate me outing her as a fan...But ABC Family is doing something interesting with their Greek series. It allows viewers to set up social groups with scheduled viewing times where the groups can watch together. The show starts when the moderator shows up. If you're not part of a group, you can piggyback groups with empty slots (which my wife does in the wee hours when she get home from work). They're turning online TV viewing into a type of virtual social event. I'm not sure about the details, but I believe you can also chat about the show on their site while watching, etc.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy