The Skinny on Social Responsibility PDF E-mail
J. Kristin Ament   
Sunday, 13 May 2007
 
This week, Unilever announced a company-wide initiative to ban size zero models from appearing in advertising for any of its products. The company says it “believes in a healthy balanced diet and that both men and women have the right to feel comfortable with their bodies and not suffer from lack of self-esteem brought on by images of excessive slimness."

 

Well, it’s about time.

 

More than a year and a half ago, Dove (a Unilever brand) rocked the industry when its brilliant Campaign for Real Beauty launched during the Super Bowl. The campaign, so wonderfully committed to building self-esteem in girls and women, set a new standard for social responsibility and won industry accolades.

 

But while Dove bolted out of the station, proudly speeding toward a new, enlightened world, everyone else stayed behind in the waiting area, looking down and shuffling around.

 

We all know about our nation’s obesity epidemic, particularly the risk facing our kids. We know that children are at risk of diabetes, heart disease, and a host of other ailments unless we stop feeding them plates of trans-fats and cups of high fructose corn syrup. Media have worked hard to educate us, and a growing number of companies are taking action by altering their products or marketing strategies. They all are to be commended.

 

But why are so few paying attention to the sobering statistics about eating disorders on the rise among our nation’s children? According to a recent study by Colgate University, two-thirds of all girls have been on a diet before the age of 10. Forty-two percent girls between first and third grade want to be thinner. One in ten girls has vomited to lose weight by the age of nine.

 

And what’s the number one wish of girls age 11-17? Is it a horse, a fabulous wardrobe, money, or a cute boyfriend? Nope. Above all things, they want to lose weight.

 

While parents can do their best to instill self-esteem and encourage healthy habits, they’re often powerless against the thousands of images of unattainable beauty that reach kids through ever-stretching media channels.

 

Tragically popular are the Pro-Ana and Pro-Mia movements, which praise the eating disorders anorexia and bulimia and offer tips for “success.” They also are the subjects of thousands of YouTube videos. At the moment, there are more than 3,740 “Thinspiration” videos on the site, which typically feature images of super skinny girls and women, accompanied by such words of “encouragement” as “Hunger hurts but starving works” and “Beauty is seeing the bones.” (I purposely am not including a link to an example video, as 61,702 views are enough.)

 

The images shown in these videos aren’t just uber-thin celebrities such as Nicole Ritchie and Keira Knightley. Nor are they all shots of models striking poses on the catwalk during Fashion Week. Many of them feature photos taken from product advertisements.

 

Unilever, however slowly, is setting an example of social responsibility. But it certainly can’t be a sole agent for change. Who else will step up by stepping away from potentially devastating images of beauty?


Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (1)Add Comment
Brava!
written by Patrick, May 13, 2007 10:02 PM
This is a fantastic example of true leadership. So many companies claim to "lead"...but only if it doesn't cost them anything. The big, bold, courageous act here for Unilever is that it is actually going against the very beauty business that helped bring it to power. That's smart business: what took you one place at one time is not what will keep you there, or fuel future growth. These campaigns look like social responsibility (they are)...but are also something else: innovation. Cheers to Unilever. Validate your consumers, and they will be loyal to you forever.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy