Super Bowl Ads Do More than Sell Stuff PDF E-mail
Bryan K. Oekel   
Monday, 04 February 2008

 

With a few exceptions, I thought last night’s Super Bowl ads were lackluster at best.  Since today’s most-blogged-about topic will likely be the best and worst ads, I thought I’d take a slightly different approach with this post and discuss the underlying cultural significance of a few of the spots.  After all, advertising is the art of commercialism, and like all art it’s a reflection of our society.  Last night’s ads from Audi, Bud Light, GoDaddy.com and SalesGenie.com point to broader things happening in consumer culture – both good and bad.

 

Audi’s spot for its super-sleek R8 that parodied “The Godfather” was particularly interesting. 

 

 

 

It was refreshing to see a luxury car maker use humor and a bit of an edge instead of overly pretentious beauty shots of the car zigzagging through mountain s-curves. 

 

But more importantly, Audi is quite cleverly capturing and leveraging society’s shifting notions of luxury with its tagline and overriding message – “Old luxury just got put on notice.”  It positions “old luxury” as corrupt (Mafiosi), staid and boring. 

 

This dichotomy between the “nouveau riche” and “old money” is something I believe we’ll see more and more of as a new generation of technology professionals and other self-made entrepreneurs become “new money” members of the luxury class.  Luxury brands will begin to reposition themselves away from mere elitism, and we’ll see more of them rebelling against the pomposity and pretentiousness of “old luxury.”  While luxury brands will always be about status, I believe this will take more of a backseat to messaging focused on the scarcity or special-ness of the experience itself – not the luxury logo as a better-than-you badge.

 

Bud Light’s ads as a collective whole also fascinated me.  You have to hand it to Bud Light and our good friends at Anheuser-Busch.  They’re consistently in brand with Bud Light and they very rarely stray from the “dude” voice they’ve owned for so long. 

 

 

 

But besides their humor and consistency, these ads take a strategic gamble that could pay off in the long run.  Wine and spirits, as well as craft and import beers, are capturing share from embattled mainstream beers because they’re perceived as more sophisticated by millennial consumers.  Bud Light must believe the backlash against sophistication for sophistication’s sake and the “metrosexualization” (hate that word – is it still 2005?) of American men is inevitable.  And I’m not sure I disagree. 

 

Bud Light is sticking to its guns and being what it’s always been:  not-so-serious and unapologetically masculine.  The brand is admirable because it has the ability to laugh at itself – and its drinkers.  The only question is how long will customers be in on the joke?  Bud Light ads brilliantly capture the stereotypes of the mainstream beer category.  For longtime fans that’s a great thing.  As for driving trial and building new brand loyalists, only time will tell if this approach will pay off.   

 

GoDaddy.com’s “Exposure” spot featuring Danica Patrick disgusted me.  

 

 

 

It’s sad to see that in this day and age we still continue to sexualize our female sports heroes.  Patrick is a respectable IRL driver in her own right, but she still feels the need to be a sex symbol and to participate in lowbrow jokes about “her beaver”.  Whether it’s Danica Patrick, Anna Kournikova, Maria Sharapova or a random “hot” high school pole vaulter, it’s sad that we still can’t see past women athlete’s looks.  Shame on you, GoDaddy, for perpetuating the problem.  Of course, I’d expect nothing less given your previous Super Bowl spots.

 

Lastly, SalesGenie.com’s spots reminded me that that we still have a long way to go when it comes to race relations. 

 

 

 

 

Perhaps my negative reactions to the cartoon Panda as a bad Asian stereotype or the Indian (?) salesman with “seven kids” point to my own subconscious stereotyping. 

 

But to me these spots were outright racist.  Could they have gotten away with it if the Panda was a real-life actor speaking in the poorly done Asian accent?  I’m all for non-PC entertainment that creates a bit of tension and opens dialog about racial or religious differences.  And since I’m writing about them, I guess the SalesGenie.com spots have done that, in a sense.  However, I think these spots are merely playing to and solidifying racial stereotypes rather than working against them.  Or perhaps I’m just an old fuddy-duddy. 

 

For a change the game took the spotlight over the ads for this once-a-year sports fan.  But despite a somewhat poor showing from this year’s advertisers, the cultural phenomenon that is Super Bowl advertising was nonetheless revealing.  I’m just hoping next year’s ads make it a little harder to get up from the recliner for a Bud Light during the commercial breaks.
 
 

 

**To read more articles by this author, click on the name under the headline** 
 
 
Full disclosure: Anheuser-Busch and Budweiser are clients of Patrick Davis Partners, publishers of Unbound Edition.
 


Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (7)Add Comment
Keep that SalesGenie in the bottle
written by Kristin, February 04, 2008 03:11 PM
I'd say SalesGenie should fire its agency for those completely offensive, ethnically sterotyped spots, but the Chairman/founder did them. Even worse? His name is Vin Gupta. Is that not a name of Indian descent? Quit your day job, sir. Please.
Bud Light? Fire?
written by Damon Maack, February 04, 2008 03:14 PM
Can someone please explain to me the very first Bud Light ad? Of all of the special powers that we can say a great beer brings, why fire breathing? Isn't beer supposed to be ice cold and refreshing? So strange. And I completely agree with you on Sales Genie. All we needed was Mickey Rooney as the buck-toothed Japanese guy in "Breakfast at Tiffany's" to make the nightmare complete. Overall, a bad year for these commercials. So much hype for so little payoff.
Don't Keep it Coming
written by Perplexed Budfan, February 04, 2008 04:43 PM
Yes, Damon, I also didn't get two of the AB ads... the firebreather and flying guy. The Wine and Cheese Party fit the beloved formula... 20-30-something guys cleverly bypassing social decorum and relationship obligations so they can drink budlight. We've seen (and loved) them before: guys sneaking beer into the opera, a best man hiring an auctioneer to speed up the boring wedding ceremony, a guy using a literal rock to win a paper, rock, scissors game, husbands secretly grilling and drinking on the roof of their homes while the wives think they are cleaning gutters or reconfiguring satellites - each of those past gems reflected the key demographic while making us laugh. These other two were bizarre, really. A shift away from consumer-centric toward product-centric (Bud Light makes you breath fire or fly?), and the tagline this year, Keeps it Coming, is the odd glue that was supposed to bind them all together? I don't get the antecedent. Keeps what coming? My mind drifted to the vulgar. The caveman ad was fine, but viewed together, they felt incongruous. And the Mencia ad was almost as stereotypical as the salesgenie ads. hahaha... all immigrants are socially retarded. I get it. Last year's prequel, in which Mencia was teaching the immigrants how to order a budlight in different regions of the US, was MUCH better, and much less offensive to immigrants.

what is love?
written by nutterbutter, February 04, 2008 05:21 PM
Can we discuss the Diet Pepsi Max ad with the "Night at the Roxbury" head bob to "What is Love?" That was just terrible. Neither culturally relevant today, nor a big enough deal to revisit with nostalgia. Good that Chris Kattan found work, but that one was a big miss to me.

And yes, Perplexed Budfan, my mind also went to the gutter when we all were trying to understand what Bud Light means with "Keeps it Coming." But really, what is "it?" Certainly not any sort of consistency among its ads.
WSJ
written by Damp, February 04, 2008 09:12 PM
WSJ had a story about the Sales Genie CEO. They won worst ad last year and tried to retain the title this year. Apparently all the negative publicity really built awareness and drove people to the website. This wasn't just bad though, as you Kristin points out. The Pandas were Charlie Chan bad. I don't get what ethnicity even had to do with it. Why make the characters Indian or Asian? Weird.
SalesGenie.com...
written by E.R., February 04, 2008 09:36 PM
Sales Genie looks like the antithesis of new media marketing to me... hopped up direct response. Add a dash of questionable transparency and a healthy dose of the cold call.

I'd sure like to hear from the crew here in S.F. that had to execute that one. It was like an eSurance commercial gave a deep south country club a booty call. Ah well, I suppose you have to keep the lights on somehow.

E.

vote daddy?
written by ts, February 05, 2008 10:11 AM
i logged on to godaddy to see the spot. they asked for your demographic information - including your political affiliation!

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy