Target Tells a Blogger to Go Away PDF E-mail
Michael Barbaro   
Monday, 28 January 2008
Target to the blogosphere: you’re irrelevant.


Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (3)Add Comment
stupid
written by Damp, January 28, 2008 02:28 PM
Isn't this just an example of having too long a leash on the assistant account exec manning the customer relations emails? No seasoned pro would make such an broad statement about an entire medium in this situation. This same complaint could have come from the Akins County Mother's Club, and should have been addressed the same way - by focusing on the message, not the medium.
stupider
written by The Lady, Sans Hump, January 28, 2008 05:04 PM
no way an junior acct exec was allowed to talk to the NYTIMES. this is target's policy and the message was surely approved. but you are right, it seems as amateur and off base as any inexperienced agency drone.
wait...
written by Damp, January 28, 2008 05:23 PM
I agree no hack talked to target. The hack responded to an e-gripe from Shaping Youth, some fringe parenting blog, who then starting hollerin' about target not respecting non-traditional media. At the time, I'm sure the intern or whoever didn't think it was a big deal. New York Times got wind of it from the blog, then contacted Target for the newspaper story. That's when the big guns came in to clean up the mess. I agree this is totally a policy, which is why the rep who spoke to NYT had to varify the policy, but I don't think a seasoned pro would have communicated it to a media outlet, even a nontraditional one. Just goes to show that no media line call or email is too unimportant to be taken lightly.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy