Wait, McDonald’s is Super Sizing Children? PDF E-mail
Theresa Voyles   
Wednesday, 23 January 2008

 

Last week, the McDonald’s Corporation voluntarily chose to withdraw its sponsorship on the cover of Florida County school reports cards. They cited corporate responsibility for the health and well-being of children as a primary reason. Some believed that the campaign “preyed on children.” Please.

 

The report card does not say “CONGRATS! Eat french fries EVERY DAY!” Instead it rewards children with a happy meal for good grades, few absences or leadership. One Happy Meal per 8-week quarter, or four times a year.

 

Pizza Hut started a similar incentive in 1985. The BOOK IT! Program rewards children with personal pan pizzas simply for reading. My elementary school developed a competition between classes and, simple enough, the class that read the most won a pizza party. Two slices of cheese pizza and a semester’s worth of elementary literature in my head left me a happy camper.

 

A commentator on AdAge stated, “fast food is almost as vilified as cigarettes.” Brash. Examine the health risks of a McNugget Happy Meal versus nearly 600 additives in cigarettes. Nobody rewards a child with cadmium (battery acid), acetone (nail polish remover), and arsenic (rat poison) for passing social studies with an A-.

 

I ate McDonald’s as a child. Driving two children around from school to endless clubs and practices was a daunting task for my mother. Take into account that her cooking skills were sparse and we welcomed fast food. A cheeseburger happy meal with an orange Hi-C was my dinner of champions. Extra fries if we behaved well. Not healthy? Duh.

 

So what did I do? I got off my itty bitty bottom and exercised. Rode a bike, played tag with the neighbor kids or used our couch cushions as a trampoline (sorry mom and dad). The most I ever sat down was when I read a book and I was rewarded with, PIZZA! Hooray! Responsible parenting, physical fitness and food in moderation encourage healthy children.

 

Restaurant mega chains like Pizza Hut and McDonald’s are not out to get our kids. I do not believe in manipulating children for marketing, but I also do not see rewarding them once in awhile as a dire situation. Two years ago, McDonald’s began sending Ronald to poorly funded schools where he led exercise classes and taught children about healthy eating. The McDonald’s folks in Florida will still print the district’s report cards sans McD’s logo and meal offer. Still, people complain about corporate sponsorship of schools.

 

A number of public schools are cutting physical education, music and theatre programs just to afford books. Something has to give. Pun alert: that’s another issue that makes me Grimace.

 

 

**to read more articles by this author, click the name under the headline**

 



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (4)Add Comment
Don't Touch My Fries
written by Michele, January 25, 2008 10:08 AM
I totally agree. I loved reading when I was a kid, and it was great to be rewarded with some pizza now and then. My mom only let us have pizza occasionally, so it was a treat for us and a financial break for her.

I guess I could see corporate sponsorship on a report card - no matter who the sponsor is - as a little inappropriate, but I don't think these programs should be taken away.
yes, but...
written by Fatty McNuggets, January 25, 2008 06:28 PM
Will the happy meal itself hurt anything? Not at all. And I'm all for rewarding kids for good deeds. But why do we always make fast-food or candy or ice cream the prize for a child's success? And how clever of McDonalds to establish itself as the "reward" for their hard work. It's smart marketing, but I'm not a fan. And why do we always say "It was good enough for us when we were kids." If we used that logic, women would still be at home and we'd all be driving around trashed, holding our babies in our laps.

Perhaps we can find some other wonderful treat to reward our kids for hard work. An experience rather than an empty ritual that is, though no comparison to cancer-causing cigarettes, bad for us.

Humans have always celebrated with food, but was it always with such crappy food? And wasn't it more about coming together as a group than the food itself? Why is it I look more forward to the food I'll be eating in celebration than the company with whom I'm be celebrating? Maybe there's some room for improvement?
topic hijack?
written by Damp, January 28, 2008 03:16 PM
The food becoming more important than the celebration itself is interesting. How did that happen? I think it's important, given all the studies showing fewer people eating together as families, and the possible consequences for our culture.

When my parents (I'm 29) were young, going to McDonalds was special because they NEVER ate out. Their parents' budget prevented them from going to the more expensive restaurants at all, so a semi-annual trip to McDonalds (one of the cheapest options) was a rare treat. Plus, my grandmothers had many more kids, and couldn't cook. The fact that McDonald's didn't use evaporated milk or okra added to its appeal.

Now contrast that with when I grew up... My parents were wealthy by comparison, we went out often, and there were so many more restaurant options. The experience itself wasn't special, and the budget didn't restrict our choices to fast-food. It became more about the individual restaurant, ie: the food. Maybe that's why I'm so indifferent about McDonald's, and why no one at my elementary school got excited about the McDonald's good grades promotions. I think people who had the former experience with McDonalds as children care more about this issue than now-adults for whom, as kids, McDonalds was nothing special. I suspect it's about nostalgia more than principle.
McDonald's Encouraging Crime
written by johnv, February 22, 2008 12:06 PM
Isn't McDonald's also Encouraging crime through the use of the Ham Burgular and his terrifying mask!!

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy