Misplaced Focus PDF E-mail
Benjamin Carr   
Monday, 23 April 2007

 

In his manifesto video, Cho Seung-Hui, that pathetic, selfish jackass responsible for the Virginia Tech massacre, re-enacts scenes from Oldboy, one of my favorite movies. The movie is a violent revenge thriller, but, in defense of the movie, it's also about how the protagonist is in some way responsible for his own sad state AND how that revenge darkens everyone and takes its toll.

 

There are no winners in the film. There is no singular point of blame.

 

Apparently, for someone who liked the film in a "Gosh, that violence sure is cool!" way, the Virginia Tech killer missed its essential point almost entirely. Maybe he was too caught up in the bloody climax to realize what the whole thing was all about. Or maybe he missed the film's ending, where the hero is essentially doomed.

 

If it were possible to ignore this whiny, petty, idiotic brat and his diatribe about being misunderstood and "driven" to do this, we would collectively be better off. Most people come to accept that the universe owes them nothing and isn't really required to pay attention to them at all. The best ones even realize that they're ultimately responsible for improving their lives and then go about making their life better.

 

Liviu Librescu, one of the professors killed in the attack, had survived the Holocaust. He was shot through a classroom door that he was holding closed so that others could escape the gunfire.

 

Ryan Clark, the student from Georgia who was among the first killed, was an RA in the dorm that was attacked. He could've graduated in December but took extra classes because he wanted to walk at graduation. He volunteered summers at a music camp for disabled children. He was trying to protect other students when he was killed.

 

The victims' voices are the ones I wish we could hear, but they're not getting the chance to offer up their manifesto to the news.

 

It's annoying to me that their killer is the only one who had the opportunity to say goodbye to the world, assuming that the world would care about his deranged multimedia picture book and bad, bad writing. It doesn't shock me. It doesn't horrify me. It doesn't alarm me that maybe I should change my behavior. The whole diatribe strikes me as pathetic. (I've written my own share of lengthy, pathetic diatribes in my life, railing at an unfair world that doesn't care. But it's the same world that everyone's in, and everyone has as much of a reason, or can find as much of a reason, to complain as I can.)

 

I know the manifesto is news. I know that's why the analysis of this document is going to go on for weeks. But, really, the focus of this story should be on the killed, not on a killer with the unoriginal complaints.

 

Anyway, watch the movie if you haven't seen it. See how it doesn't glorify the very things this guy thought it did. Catch how this gun-toting loser completely missed the point.

 

People who write manifestos generally aren't prophets. They're usually disconnected, selfish lunatics who assume the world gives a damn.

 

The world doesn't.


Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (7)Add Comment
Cliche
written by LT, April 23, 2007 05:53 PM
I watched Cho's rant...and read his writings. One resounding thought kept coming to me: this fool is a cliche...his language, his plots, his tone. He suffered from a crushing absence of creativity; he was a joke. He knew this, certainly, and so turned inside out: creative turned destructive; joke turned mayhem. What he didn't see or know was that only creativity creates meaning; his inside-out actions didn't give him meaning...they were meaningless violence. Suffering is not the same as meaning; just ask the families who are mourning.
senseless
written by boyd, April 24, 2007 11:14 AM
I wish the media focused more on the victims too, but it seems that there's just no way around it. The violence and sensationalism is what sells. We're as much to blame as they are. Kudos to you for trying to refocus the issue.
...
written by Benj, April 24, 2007 11:32 AM
It's a cycle. The more we react to sensational news, the more the media will provide it to us. If NBC had chosen not to run those videos, someone else would've eventually.
Cliche, indeed.
written by Erin, April 24, 2007 11:43 AM
Excellent article. This tragedy was simply the result of unchecked idiocy, no "profound" or "greater cause" as the killer would have us believe. I'm glad you're bringing this up. And I'm sorry it had to be your favorite movie that he based his actions on!
OKAP,
Sis. Lovett
thanks for pointing . . .
written by Marley, April 24, 2007 11:49 AM
out that we shouldn't be focusing on the killer. He's not worth our time, our energy, our thoughts. I haven't seen his video rants. Nor do I care to. I have no desire to know what he said or didn't say. His videos aren't going to explain why he did what he did. And nor do I need to waste my time trying to figure it out. But I can spend my time and energy thinking of the victims and survivors of this massacre and remember them for their accomplishments in life and be grateful for those who can still succeed and change the world.
...
written by Thomas Wood Rittenhouse, April 24, 2007 02:18 PM
I think it's curious where the media draws, and we, the line as far as "moral boundaries." In hockey games and even football games occasionally, when there is a fight, the cameras are turned away immediately. But the fights are aired later on the news and on highlights shows. We weren't shown Steve Irwin's fatal sting ray injury, but we saw Saddam Hussein hanged. Thousands in traffic will slow to see the bloody aftermath of a car crash, but we turn our noses at violence in movies like "Oldboy."
It's almost like we--and I include the media in "we" because the media feeds us what we want and we feed them ratings and ad sales--pretend to separate ourselves from the savage law of the past, which governed all of us. But every now and then, we like to see that blood shed, even if we pretend like we don't, and we want to connect with that killer who has so freely detached from contemporary law and bucked the consequences. What would you do in a world without order?
Well ...
written by Benj, April 24, 2007 03:42 PM
Maybe it's a fallacy that the world has order. Maybe that fallacy is the thing that keeps us functioning.

The thing that bugs me about this Va. Tech killer, though, is it just raises the stakes for the next one. And, sadly, there will always be a next one.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy