IDK, My BFF, Jill? PDF E-mail
Lauren Begley   
Friday, 26 October 2007

 

A client in the process of expanding its business informed me yesterday that a job applicant submitted an inquiry on the company website in a rather unusual manner. It read: want job call me ltr with dtls. No punctuation. No clear message. No job.

 

Although the original message could have been interpreted as, “Hello! I am currently seeking employment and I am interested in learning more about the company. Please contact me at your convenience,” the meaning was lost in text message-like translation.

 

As a Generation Y college student, I frequently use text messaging and e-mail when necessary, though I believe I am at least capable of writing an academic paper or press release, let alone an informal job inquiry. However, I too have seen the growing inability in my generation and younger to formulate a cohesive sentence or paragraph in or out of the classroom.

 

Text messaging, e-mail and other on-line communication conduits have simplified not only the manner in which we communicate but the messages themselves. Abbreviated verbiage has begun to find its way into the everyday communication of the Web 2.0 Generation. And with Britney Spears allegedly ending her marriage via text message, I fear that our culture has a more warped sense of civility than I originally thought.

 

With companies like Disney launching tech-comm products to kids, I worry the value of the written word may seem less important to kids whose teachers already find it difficult to open their minds to classic literature and creative writing in the classroom. While I see incredible value in speedy on-line interaction, those who have grown up using Instant Message and texting as primary communication tools, they may be at a serious disadvantage in the future.

 

What do you think? Is the value of the written word in danger?

 

 

 

**to read more articles by this author, click on the name under the headline**



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (3)Add Comment
angst
written by charlotte darwin, October 26, 2007 12:44 PM
Just a short time ago, the death of the properly written word would have seemed impossible. But now it's very real. And that both scares me and pisses me off. Language is largely what separates human from amoeba. Well, and brain stems and opposable thumbs and whatnot, but still. This represents a major cultural/sociological/evolutionary regression. We might as well just start letting our knuckles scrape the ground again. My generation wrote. We still do. Sure, I can ROFL until I get rugburns, but I'll be damned if I'm going to join the masses in their vanity plate speak. Stand strong, my literate friends! And, oh, how I wish some rube would submit a job inquiry to me like the one addressed in this piece. I'm giddy just thinking of my response.
We’re evolving still, Charlotte.
written by Damp Duvet, October 26, 2007 03:58 PM
As an ex-English teacher, I have my fair share of anecdotal evidence that the written word is in decline, but it's unfair to place the blame solely on email and text messaging. These technologies are tools of adaptation to help “modern� man prosper in a culture that demands efficient, not substantive communication. More disturbing to me are the physiological changes we’re seeing in the brain itself. In an age of sound bytes and rapid-fire headlines, attention spans atrophy. Brains pare away billions of neurological connections, which are now as strange and unnecessary as the human appendix. ADD is not a disability, it is an adaptation: the cognitive equivalent to the webbing those weird African squirrels developed to soar from treetop to treetop, eliminating all that tiresome climbing.

This won't make me popular amongst my colleagues, but the real responsibility for language’s decline falls squarely on whoever is pressing the fast-forward button, and those of us who have stopped struggling against the current. This includes English teachers. We don't teach kids to love language; we teach "Shakespeare made easy." We don't teach comprehensive grammar, we "trouble-shoot" with mini-lessons targeting common punctuation mistakes. That's why 75% of my graduating seniors last year couldn't distinguish between a noun and an adverb.

I know several teachers who, tired of kids not reading at home, are now turning over half of every class for reading time. I know a teacher who has given up on the novel completely, teaching only short stories. And I left English altogether after one year, in shock at how much things have changed, and unwilling to commit the time and energy necessary just to keep running in the same place.

Last year, I tried to teach kids how to write an essay. This year I'm teaching kids how to use PowerPoint.

Let he who is without DSL cast the first stone.
Good points
written by Mindy, October 26, 2007 10:54 PM
Very well written thoughts by all. I raised these concerns in an earlier blog at http://www.unboundedition.com/content/view/357/50/. But I am amazed at how many poor writers there are who emerged even before this generation. I don't have the answer, but am very proud that although my 7-year-old son knows his way around the computer and could have spent the evening watching TV, he literally fell asleep with his nose in a book. I've always expressed the importance of reading and writing in order to learn how to function in this world, and think that is important for teachers and parents to communicate that this balance is important in life.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy