There’s No Sexism in the Champagne Room PDF E-mail
Boyd Pearson   
Sunday, 15 April 2007
 
Last week, I did my best to ignore all the media hype around the Imus stuff. Media usually hypes the wrong issues and Don Imus had become irrelevant to me (and many others I believe). However, after watching this YouTube clip and reading this, Imus became relevant again, and I could see why so many were so upset. I went back and read, watched and listened to everything I could get my hands on.
 
Here’s what the Reverend Al Sharpton had to say when Imus was fired: “We cannot afford a precedent established that the airways can be used to commercialize and mainstream sexism and racism. But they'll be no champagne bottle popping by those of us involved in this. This is not about gloating." Hearing that, I couldn't continue to listen to Reverend Al without a little judgment of my own.

 

I don’t view Imus as part of “America’s soul." And I certainly don’t think he knew 9/11 secrets. He got fired because he made back-assward, ignorant, cruel statements, and advertisers didn’t want to be associated with that. Case closed. It’s just that the holier than thou attitude of Reverend Al and his posse bugs the hell out of me, as it’s about as hypocritical as can be fathomed.

 

***Before I go any further, I want to say that I love rap music. So, using it as an example below does not mean I want good old Reverend Al to go after it. I hope and pray he doesn’t. Watered down rap is crap. (I never said I was good at rapping. Just that I like it.) I just want to expose his, in my opinion, HILARIOUS hypocrisy in his newfound quest to "make all it clear that no one should denegrate women or a specific race." He loves a good spotlight doesn’t he? And second, I want to come clean that there was a time when I liked Imus. So, take that at what it’s worth.***

 

Reverend Al went after Don Imus like Mark Foley heads to a chat board full of 15 year old boys. And that would be fine with me, if Reverend Al had any credibility to do so. I haven’t heard this vitriol from him regarding rap music, which he has had years upon years to do. I never saw any press conferences with him going after N.W.A. or Tupac or Eminem or R. Kelly (who, by the way, has done a whole lot more to young black women other than insult them.)

 

Check these lyrics from one of the top songs currently playing on the radio:

 

“Now Hit Da Dance Floor
Now Bend Your Back Low
She Do It Wit No Hands
Now Stop Pop And Roll
Im Smokin Bubba Hoe
Now Ya'll In Trouble Hoe
I Like Da Way She Move
An Undercover Hoe
Now Everybody Leanin…

 

…Grey Goose

Double Shots

It Will Let Your Body Go

My Niggas On My Side

Hatas Hatin Think It's Funny

Im Walkin On These Niggas

Now Im Gettin 2 Da Money

Froze On Dem Hoes

I'm Not Talkin Bout Dancin

Fool Count On Da Charm

Diamond Steady Steady Hancin”

 

I would argue that if Don Imus had merely read these words on the air, and they had been original to him, then Reverend Al would’ve been looking for a microphone faster than a pre-stomach stapled Al Roker went after a doughnut. (I do have to pause for a moment and laugh at the notion of those lyrics being original to Don Imus.)

 

And I’m not the first person to make this comparison between rap music and Imus. Obama did. But perhaps Obama isn’t black enough in Reverend Al's mind to not see the hypocrisy. Seriously, many are saying that rap is now next.

 

I could go on with other examples throughout rap, but here’s the thing. As much as I love Obama and as much as I know that rap can be intense, I think he’s wrong. I don’t want the dialogue stymied. I don’t want censored rap. I don’t want R. Kelly to have to stay trapped in the closet. I want true freedom of speech.

 

I just don’t get it. Why can’t we just change the channel? Why can’t we just ignore the ignorance? I view Sean Hannity as basically having the same intellect as a retarded giraffe, but I still think that he should be allowed to say his piece. (My apologies to all retarded giraffes for the comparison. Best I could do.) He’s definitely equally as closed minded and rude as Imus, and yet advertisers keep on pushing products through him.

 

Now, don’t get me wrong, I think that every advertiser has the right to advertise on whatever program they want. They aren’t required to advertise on Imus. It’s their choice. Just like it’s CBS or MSNBC’s choice to fire him. To me, though, it’s just that the whole situation is so completely soaked in hypocrisy. For these advertisers or networks to act like they did not know what they were getting into when the advertised/hired Imus just reeks of…um…well…bullshit.

 

Either they had never heard Imus before hiring/advertising with him, meaning they are bad at their jobs, or they are lying in their shock now. There really is no other option. The “well I knew he was a bad boy, but I never knew he’d be that bad of a boy” defense smells like…well…reference above.

 

Look, what Imus did was despicable. As Jeff Greenfield said to Hannah Storm, Imus’ crack was aimed at people who hadn’t brought it on and couldn’t fight back. And picking on helpless people isn’t funny. (I guess unless it’s South Park doing it. Those guys can make ANYTHING funny.) I would never try and defend Imus’ comments. They were disgusting and wrong and cruel. I’m just trying to put them into context.

 

Imus loves pushing the envelope. His humor is, in a large part, funny due to its despicability, and it really has never bothered me. But I’m not one who is easily offended. For me, killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians in a needless war is FAR more offensive than anything Don Imus could ever say.

 

It’s something else Greenfield said in that interview that resonated. It’s that Imus’ comments especially sounded bad to people who had never listened to Imus, and I’m just guessing that most, if not all, of the Rutgers team had never heard Imus and knew absolutely nothing about him. Thus, they had no context. Thanks to our media, who loves a good shock story rather than a story of substance and importance, everyone heard this clip 60,000 times. And while that DEFINITELY does not excuse what Imus said, anyone hear that the green zone was bombed this past week?

 

I guess it comes down to this. I hate Ann Coulter. I wish she’d just go away. When I hear her speak, she offends me. But I would fight like hell to keep it so she has a right to speak freely. Just like I’d fight like hell for Bachem Macuno to be able to respond. That’s the essence of free speech in a free society. If you don’t want to participate, change the channel, walk away, ignore it. As for me, I’ll be watching Dave Chappelle, South Park, Sarah Silverman, and Chris Rock and praying Reverend Al doesn’t get a hold of them too.


Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (7)Add Comment
Old Man Speaketh
written by LT, April 16, 2007 04:29 PM
Isn't the issue here that Imus doesn't have cultural passport to speak? He took the bait...used the language of the streets...and got called on it. Other commentators (Chris Rock, Chappelle, Silverman, as you point out...Lenny Bruces, all) certainly have crossed lines as well. But, because of age, race or gender, they had the right to...or, perhaps, they just were "cool enough" or "current enough" to do so? Imus is an old man...with an old voice. He has more weight of history on him because he has lived longer. The younger generation knows that a contemporary comes from a different place (usually)...and so grants permission to say more...get away with more. As for CBS, et al...I ain't sayin' they be gold diggas...I'm just sayin they ain't hangin with no broke... Large Tuna out.
Well said
written by RO, April 16, 2007 06:08 PM
Excellent post. I too think that Don Imus got railroaded, but I certainly don't rap to be the next target. I'm just amused by the fact that Obama can decry Imus, but share a stage with Ludacris, and that Hillary Clinton can take $400,000 in campaign contributions from Timbaland.
freedom of speech
written by Jeremy Pierce, April 16, 2007 07:47 PM
Too many people have complained about Imus being fired on the grounds of freedom of speech. I know you're not saying that, but I think it ought to be made clear that the freedom to say what you want does not entail a right for anyone to give you time or the means to say it to people via the means of your choice. Firing Imus doesn't constitute a violation of free speech. As I said, I know you're not saying that, but I think this distinction is worth making.
Re: Freedom of speech
written by Maureen, April 16, 2007 10:37 PM
Jeremy, thank you for making that distinction. Don Imus fell victim to something each of us are vulnerable to. Our bosses can get rid of us if we screw up. If I work for an advertising agency and I put something out that embarrasses the biggest account we have, hell yes, I'm going to get fired. He pushed the envelope and it finally tore. That's business in America. If he wants to go stand on a tree stump and say whatever he wants, the government is not supposed to interfere (they can make him get a permit, I guess). But they cannot interfere with a sponsor's decision to fire someone who they think is going to cost them money because of his own actions.

Old Man Speaketh, you make a good point. If a Black comedian calls the women in his audience "nappy-headed hoes", he gets laughs because he's a "brother" to them. It's affectionate in a way. I doubt that Imus, an old conservative White dude, has a lot of "sisters" listening to him every day. And that's the difference between teasing and ridiculing.
Great article
written by Matthew Pritchard, April 17, 2007 12:10 AM
Wow, great article and nice links to video, blogs, & articles. A true multimedia journalistic response!
...
written by Clive, April 17, 2007 10:23 AM
The main point is that it's time for Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and their ilk to be quiet and go away. Jackie Mason tears Sharpton up here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwgCMNXqw_M

He really needs to apologize himself for more than a few things. At least Don Imus was sincere in his apology.
Great points. And here's another obvious omission
written by tim, May 13, 2007 10:55 PM
Where was Al Sharpton on this? http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/newsom.asp

Looks like that doesn't matter to good old Al. Why is his voice respected in ANY way. He's a total douche.


Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy