Whoopi Goldberg’s Racist Logic PDF E-mail
Patrick T. Davis   
Tuesday, 04 September 2007

 

Today, during her premiere on ABC’s “The View,” Whoopi Goldberg came to the defense of Michael Vick. Whether publicity stunt for ratings, genuinely held opinion, or spontaneous outpouring of stupidity, there’s a fundamental problem with Goldberg’s logic. It’s racist, at its core.

 

Like all Americans, she is entitled to her view and her voice. But the reasoning behind what she said has historic and current weight of which Goldberg should be more than aware. Whoopi excuses Michael Vick’s torture of animals by saying, "You know from his background this is not an unusual thing for where he comes from…There are certain things that are indicative to certain parts of our country.” Co-host Joy Behar challenged Goldberg, asking if dog torture and murder were OK. Goldberg replied, "Unfortunately it's part of the thing.” In short, Ms. Goldberg indicated that because Vick is from “the South” he has a different moral center. She said dog killing was mere “sport.”

 

In defending Vick’s universally reprehensible actions, Goldberg engaged in precisely the racist rhetoric that justified slavery for years. It is in the hearts of many who still live in the South. Too often we hear, “He doesn’t mean to be a racist, it’s just how he was brought up.” Or, “She’s from Alabama, and there is a different view of the world down there.” Excuses are made for the worst views and behaviors possible, all based on “they don’t know better” arguments. Goldberg excuses Vick, saying, "This is part of his cultural upbringing...This is a kid who comes from a culture when this is not questioned." This is a flimsy, weak-minded excuse for moral failing, in whatever form. I am from the South. I work in Atlanta. Should I have lower moral expectations for myself or my neighbors? Should I excuse any and all form of violence and hatred because of cultural geography?

 

Regardless of where we are from, regardless of how we were brought up, regardless of the lessons – good and bad – we are taught along the way, at some point each adult is responsible for his or her own mind. To vacate one’s morality because we are from “the South” doesn’t apply to any of us, black or white. And it doesn’t apply to dog fighting any more than it applies to racism. Cruelty is cruelty, in any form, and immoral in all of them. Ms. Goldberg surely knows this – or should know better.

 

Whoopi Goldberg owes the American people – especially African Americans – an apology for giving weight to the historically racist logic she used to defend the indefensible Michael Vick.

 

 

 

 

 

*To see more work by this author, click on their name.*



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (16)Add Comment
tuning out
written by creole lady marmalade, September 04, 2007 01:36 PM
I wish I could say I'm surprised by Whoopi here, but this is the same woman who encouraged (and helped to write) the entirely crass blackface speech her then boyfriend Ted Danson gave several years back when she was roasted by the Friars Club. Yet, I don't care if she was trying to be edgy on her first day on the show so she could make it clear that she's not going to sit there like some quiet idiot(Elisabeth). You just don't do this. I won't be watching her anymore.
...
written by Rainlillie, September 04, 2007 01:38 PM
I'm so sick of people calling for someone to apologize, simply for stating their opinion. Whoopi is entitled to her opinion and so are you. It's all about free speech.


http://rainlillie.blogspot.com/
free speech is not the issue
written by Patrick, September 04, 2007 01:56 PM
From the author: I am not arguing Ms. Goldberg's right to free speech. I am revealing the terribly flawed logic behind it. Free speech, like all other rights, comes with responsibilities. The lowest common denominator of them being: be informed. Goldberg wasn't even aware, likely, of the historic weight of her short-sighted defense.
...
written by rainlillie, September 04, 2007 03:11 PM
Free speech doesn't mean you have a right to say what you want as long as I agree with you.
you miss the point
written by josemocha, September 04, 2007 03:54 PM
rainlillie - you miss the point. free speech, without thought behind it, is just air. and that's what we call are belch, or a fart. i don't think the piece is about free speech. should anybody be allowed any time to say anything? can you scream fire in a packed theater when there isn't one? can you engage in hate speech -- and use the n-word if you are "from down south" and don't know any better? hiding behind the tiresome refrain of "free speech, free speech, free speech" isn't an argument. it's a blind eye to the more complex notions that drive culture forward - or backward.
It certainly does
written by PooP McDuck, September 04, 2007 03:54 PM
and if we actually acknowledged that it does, and put such a philosophy into practice, we might have a much better run everything...as long as I set the standard.
All speech is free, but not equal
written by Ted, September 04, 2007 04:04 PM
Hmmm... I do think she had the right to say it, just as the people who recognize the ignorance of her statement have a right to chastise her for it. Imus had the right to say what he said too, though it cost him dearly. He wasn't imprisoned, but he got his. What's perhaps most unfair is that because Woops didn't use the N' word or some other blatantly racist language, this won't get the same attention and rebuke Imus's did. And the fact that it comes from a black mouth somehow makes this kind of statement less offensive to some.
disagree
written by farley, September 04, 2007 04:15 PM
I think Whoopi basically said "the dumb N----- didn't know any better, he from da south." It is SO insulting, to everyone. Southerners, Vick, African Americans. But, then again, she has a history of being racist, as with the skit for Ted Danson.
Racist
written by Carol, September 04, 2007 04:42 PM
Completely, utterly racist. Whoopi defended Vick because he's black--and wealthy.

Gee, I wonder what she thinks of OJ?
In Whoopi's defense,
written by reader2rider, September 04, 2007 04:59 PM
She's not justifying, she's explaining. She's not a moral relativist, she's someone who's refusing to look at the story in an objective way. Don't misread my words. I'm not saying she's looking at the crime subjectively. I don't think she is. She's looking at the story subjectively.

I love my dog to death, but I'd thoroughly enjoy taking these people to Korea for a tasty dish of dog meat.
So Sad....
written by jd, September 05, 2007 09:20 AM
It's truly sad to hear or read Whoopi's words. #1 - Morality is not a geographic issue. To state that someone has, or is afforded different moral values, based on where he/she lives is flawed - within the same U.S. is just flat out dumb. #2 - Let's all take this as a good opportunity to remind our kids that "just because you can, doesn't mean you should". Yes, I agree "free speech" is free. BUT, because you can speak, doesn't mean you should. Whoopi's not alone here, by the way.

BTW - Anyone else wondering what would have happened if a white male said these words? Are we not about to enter the "double standard" debate that came out of the Imus situation? I'm glad some good (the re-thinking of "who is allowed to say what to whom") came out of a nasty, nasty comment by Imus.

She is a Joke
written by Jana B, September 05, 2007 07:06 PM
I agree with Patrick that she has the right to state her opinion, however, in trying to make sense of something so horrific as mutilating and torturing animals, Ms. Goldeberg has failed miserably. Serial killers start with animal cruelty, so it is clear that she is VERY uninformed when it comes to the violence that she is justifying by say "it's where he comes from." Well, the KKK was prominent in the south for a long long time, so are we allowed to use the "it's where we come from" excuse when they burn crosses or brutilize black americans? She should think long and hard about her stupid comments....I am from the south and the bottom line is this "You do not speak for me Ms. Goldberg, so please keep your racist statements to yourself!!!!" She is pathetic!!!
Absolutely racist
written by Demagundit, September 05, 2007 09:57 PM
What exactly is the point of saying "that is where he is from and that is his culture" if she isn't offering an excuse for him? That we should understand how this comes to be? Dogfighting is a part of CRIMINAL culture. Vick is a criminal. The other posters are absolutely correct that this same argument could be turned around to support racists. "You have to understand, where he comes from, blacks just don't drink from the same fountain!"

This is a vicious crime and the fact that the NAACP and other black Americans have rushed to his defense is disturbing.
WAKE UP!
written by american me, September 06, 2007 10:55 AM
I am from the south. I am proud of that. Next to the Native American culture, ours is the oldest in this country. It never ceases to amaze me when our culture becomes controversy, how everyone becomes an expert on the subject. We all have crosses to bear from our ancestors. While I am proud of my heritage, there are "certain things that are indicative" of it that are recognized as immoral and wrong; i.e. slavery, Jim Crowe, segregation, etc. That, unfortunately, is part of our history; and that is what it is, "HISTORY".
Mr. Vick's situation has absolutely nothing to do with southern culture, history or the color of his skin. It has to do more with individual character, intelligence, and a culture of violence that knows no race. What did Mike Vick learn from his Mother? What did Mike Vick learn at Virginia Tech? What did Mike Vick learn from being a national celebrity? If he learned anything more than arrogance or how to play football it is not apparent by his actions.
We all have our heroes. Are Michael Vick's supporters so enamored by his on field performance that excuses can be manufactured to justify his off field activities? Wake up people, black and white! Right is right and wrong is wrong! Mike was wrong, not because he is from the south, not because he was raised in the "Hood", not because of a dysfunctional family. Mike was wrong because Mike was STUPID!!! Mike was wrong because Mike chose not to grow up. Mike was wrong because Mike did not have the moral character to recognize that his activities were violent and cruel. Mike was wrong because Mike did not exhibit the intelligence to know that he "had it made" as a star athlete and, like it or not, a role model for children, sports fans and his community.
Mike Vick now has the opportunity to right himself. I wish him luck and hope he finds his redemption. I am more concerned with the redemption "our culture" as citizens of this UNITED country. Our preoccupation with celebrity and violence is alarming.
Whoopie cannot be a racist
written by George Carroll, October 11, 2007 06:53 AM
African Americans cannot be racist in a million years as they don't have the economic, political nor historical culture to be racist. White Amerikkka will always have the power to be racist. Look the way we treated the African slaves as well almost completely killing off the entire Indian population. Get real!
naive
written by ptd, December 30, 2007 04:18 PM
George! Racism can exist from any race unto another, regrettably. And let's not lose sight of the fact that two of the most powerful people in the world are African American women: Oprah and Condoleeza Rice. Media power. Political power. Financial power. Things do change, even if slowly and not for all or all at once.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy