|
Yahoo!
(or should I now say Yahoo), where’s the exclamation point?
I read between 60 and 100 media related news items a day, so, as you
would expect, I read a lot of similar stories and a lot of coverage on the same
companies over and over again: Google, Yahoo!, Time Warner, Viacom, etc. They
all dominate the conversation. And I’ve noticed something interesting about the
coverage of one of those companies. Yahoo! seems to be increasingly covered as
Yahoo. Sans exclamation. And I’m
wondering why.
This may be insignificant, but a while back, it was always
Yahoo!, and now it’s predominantly Yahoo.
See these examples:
Yahoo Adds Features to Popular E-Mail
Yahoo has also been testing overlay video ads
Yahoo Makes Football Available Overseas
Yahoo enables teachers to share lesson plans, ideas and more
Yahoo Offers Dynamic URL Rewriting
Yahoo to shut down photo service, push Flickr
Do you think this is on purpose? Strategic?
I’ve never thought Yahoo should leave the search game
entirely (I actually think they should team up with Ask, MSN and others to try
and compete with the Google), but I have long thought that Yahoo should focus
on their content business. They could be the Web’s content leader. (It’s
arguable that they already are.) Without a doubt, it’s their strongest
competitive play, and it’s an area where they could dominate. However, one
thing that holds them back is that it’s difficult to take a content company
seriously with a name like Yahoo!
According to the American
Heritage Dictionary, a yahoo is defined as “a crude or brutish person.”
According to Dictionary.com, a yahoo is defined as “an uncultivated or boorish
person; lout; philistine; yokel.” Who wants to get their content from a lout or
a yokel?
Yahoo! may have worked in the early days of the Web, but
now, we all know people take online content seriously. The New York Times is still The
New York Times online. So, I’ve been giving this some thought, and I’m
wondering if these conversations have been happening at Yahoo, and possibly,
they are beginning the slow process of a name change or evolution. (Personally,
I think Y! could work.) What do you think? Do you think Yahoo is slowly
evolving their name or am I making something out of nothing?
|
Since there's the unfortunate "yokel" alignment with definitions (though I've always pronounced that use as "yay-hoo"), maybe they can just get fully Homeresque and be "woo-hoo" instead. Exclamation point optional.
Hooked on Phonics worked for me.