Eco or Ego? PDF E-mail
Patrick T. Davis   
Monday, 27 August 2007

 

While I applaud and, I hope, help advance the “green” movement on a number of fronts, I think it is important also to recognize the functional selfishness of the entire effort. If we are honest, “going green” isn’t really about saving the planet or improving the environment. It’s about saving ourselves. Our broad, cultural hubris may let us forget these are separate things.

 

The long and violent history of Earth provides more than enough empirical evidence to conclude that the planet will continue. From meteors to ages of ice and fire to nuclear blasts – the blue dot we call home has survived. Not all of her species have, of course. But the disappearance of a species, tragic as that surely is, does not, pardon the pun, equate to the end of the world. Earth continues to spin, one hates to admit, with or without us.

 

Our ecological efforts are, ultimately, ego-logical efforts. What was once a “cause” out there championed by “leftist nuts” like Jerry Brown or Greenpeace, has become nothing less than shared, social self-awareness. Products of all sorts are coming to market to satisfy the new demand; funds of “green business” are creating “clean profit” and advancing “social commerce.”

 

But let’s not kid ourselves: a recycled milk jug or sustainable hemp farms don’t matter to a system big enough to absorb shocks of historic proportions. The milk jug and the hemp matter only, really, to us. We keep our neighborhoods – and our guilty consciences – cleaner. After so much over-indulgence, it seems right to put things back in balance. Admit, though, that this is an internal, emotional effort to clean up – not an external, planetary one. With such ego involved (“I can save the world,” the collective voice shouts) it is no surprise that the self-absorbed (and ironic) Messiahs of Hollywood are the loudest members of the choir. Private jets to the Live Earth concert prove the point plainly enough.

 

The green movement is a bit like Alli or the “morning after pill”: post-facto responsibility. So much “green” product is merely the commercial equivalent of an ecological IOU. A cake, both eaten yet not “had.” If you don’t want to be fat – forget Alli, just eat less. If you don’t want to get pregnant – take pre-cautions, not post-cautions. If you don’t want to suffocate – clean up your act before you act. Al Gore can’t have a “greener” mansion. Over-consumption is the root of the problem, not part of the solution.

 

Yes, we can make a collective difference – and open entirely new and important markets for all things “cleaner and greener.” Just don’t pretend saving your own hide is the same as saving the planet’s future place in the universe. We don’t matter that much; our purchasing patterns suggest we wish we did. “Look, Ma – I’m eating an organic apple” may matter to your Mom, but it doesn’t register with Mother Earth.



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (3)Add Comment
Save Humankind
written by Michele, August 27, 2007 04:59 PM
Maybe if the motto were "Save Humankind" instead of "Save the Planet," people would have a different perspective. Then again, most people don't seem to care too much about a species until it's endangered or even extinct. ("Why didn't someone do something to save it?!") Humans will be extinct one day, but without the selfishness of going green, it's hard for many people to care about something that they don't believe will happen in their lifetime. Unless, of course, you're a member of VHEM: http://www.vhemt.org/
interesting...
written by Damp Duvet, August 27, 2007 08:31 PM
You've sprinkled little breadcrumbs from this idea in your comments on other articles. Thanks for fleshing it out in a post. So much of me wants to believe this idea is bullshit cynacism, but if it quacks like a duck, eh? Western culture can't get its head around this truth because its theology is human-centric. I've had students tell me humans can't be destroyed by global warming because we're what God intended. That our demise would prove the absence of God. What this post suggests, at least to me, is that we're convinced we are God... that we alone determine the fate of the globe. Perhaps from your point of view, God, like the green movement, is another egotistical construct designed to reflect our own feelings of significance... kind of like divine projection? Anyway... good post.
green BS
written by reader2rider, August 28, 2007 09:20 AM
I understand your point that this green movement will ultimately do what it can to save us, as in the human race. However, I don't think anyone will be satisfied with that explanation. Similarly, I don't think many of the involved are participating because it's saving the planet. I don't think most can seriously and realistically think that far in advance (as near or far into the future as it may be, it's still phenomenologically light years away).

I think participants of the movement are motivated by an attempt to save the things we want. Yes, this motivation may be misconstrued as saving the planet, or saving ourselves. After all, both of those things are essential in 'saving what we want.' But, I believe that the masses' motivation for hopping on the green bandwagon is more...not selfish, but greedy than you suggest.

Theoretically, if we wanted to save ourselves and/or the planet, we'd exhange our lifestyles. Rather than 'green' cars or sustainable agriculture, we'd ideally (and admittedly very romantically) witness a stronger revolt against big industry. Rather, we're seeing people modifying their lifestyles. We can't be bothered too much by the end of a livable planet; so, we'll adjust our ways in such a way that we'll slow down the damage we're doing, AND we'll get to keep doing the things we do. A temporary, yet satisfying 'win/win' in people's minds.

Queen Elizabeth II participates in carbon offsetting for her transatlantic flights. Subaru has a green car manufacturing plant in a quaint wooded area in Indiana (green plants apparently make it all right to cut down trees), where they produce their standard 4-wheel-drive sport utility vehicles. Companies seriously advertise slogans like, "We're going green so you don't have to."

We're too near-sighted to be concerned with the end of the human race or a livable planet. However, we are VERY concerned about inconveniencing our lifestyles of excessive consumption and waste.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy