Imus Needs More than a Mouthwash PDF E-mail
Mary M. Phelan   
Wednesday, 11 April 2007

 

If you’re betting that Don Imus will get fired for his racist remarks about the Rutgers women’s basketball team, don’t invest a lot, because the odds are probably against it.

 

Why? Isn’t Al Sharpton right when he says this was a public, racist act, deserving Imus’ firing?

 

Imus’ defense is so weak it sounds like a fifth grade ethics class lesson: It’s not me that’s bad—it’s only what I said that’s bad. Well, true enough. Imus can’t be judged by what’s in his heart (who knows?). But he must be judged by what comes out of his mouth, because that’s what he gets paid for. In our free society, while Imus may be able to say whatever denigrating thing is in his head (and often does), he should pay for it when he goes beyond the boundaries of civility and decency.

 

Isn’t it time Imus, along with the other political broadcast jocks, be held responsible for what comes out of their mouths? Doesn’t a damaging racist remark like this deserve something more than a two-week suspension, which is equivalent to a mint mouthwash, not even an old-fashioned bar of Lava soap?

 

Senator Barack Obama got it right when he said that Imus violated the trust that comes with a public platform. But it’s likely the only trust that will be involved is the networks trusting that Imus will continue to bring in the listeners and advertisers after his two-week absence.

 

So Imus probably will not be fired. But here’s a not so novel, yet potentially effective idea for listeners who respect their fellow citizens and value the air waves: Turn Imus off. And when you shop, boycott the products he advertises.



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (4)Add Comment
The Selling of Controversy
written by Patrick, April 12, 2007 02:33 PM
Don Imus is out of bounds and out of touch, to be sure. He has been for some time. What better way to become relevant again by saying something outlandish? I'm not claiming he made his statements deliberately, but the reaction and "punishment" certainly is carefully structured. Imus is part of the cultural debate again...his show is being discussed again. And, our culture has shown too-frequent forgiveness. A public person says or does something awful (Mel Gibson, Michael Richards, et al), says "sorry," perhaps hits "rehab"...and then gets back on the career track. WE allow this, and by forgiving so easily -- and fogetting so quickly -- we as a culture are saying that we implicitly approve of what was said. Freedom of speech and human understanding matter here to be sure. So does drawing a line and not crossing it.
Read, aim, FIRED!
written by LT, April 15, 2007 12:34 PM
Bad man down! It's about time. Now, let's just hope that CBS and others don't replace Imus with equal idiots.
tempted?
written by Mickey D, April 15, 2007 12:37 PM
This won't be popular, but somebody has to say it. Amid the debate of how rappers talk about ho's vs how Imus referred to them, maybe we should be asking if the whole history of hip hop v the man dialogue has gone down? Doesn't black culture "dare" white culture to use the same language they use? Isn't that the power of "taking back" terms? Don Imus was the fish; he took the bait. He lost the clear view of the language being pushed by hip hop: "we dare YOU, white man, to ever again say what you used to say." Maybe?
McD
I have to disagree
written by tracy, April 16, 2007 06:27 PM
To me, this is simplistic and moralistic and, obviously, just plain wrong bearing in mind CBS and NBC’s puffery about “values? in firing Imus. The hypocrisy, grandstanding and trivializing of race issues is grotesque.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy