Is the Web the Way to Go for Business 2.0? PDF E-mail
Michele L. Parrish   
Thursday, 19 July 2007

 

The more I learn about the potential death of Business 2.0, the more confused I become.

 

Business 2.0 is the Time Inc. pub that focuses on start-up companies, emerging technologies, innovation and evolving trends.  Over the past year, advertising revenue has dropped 38 percent, a drop some employees at Time Inc. have attributed to the merging of the ad sales staff for all of the company’s business and finance publications including Fortune, Money, CNNMoney.com, Fortune Small Business and Business 2.0.   According to the NYT, sales representatives stopped pitching the niche appeal of Business 2.0 in favor of bigger names like Fortune.

 

So revenue from print advertising has drastically dropped.  Fine, I understand the economics of the situation.  What I don’t understand is why publication that writes about innovation in every issue would be so hard pressed to think innovatively.

 

While Time Inc. sits and whines about the fact that nobody wants to advertise on their print pages, hundreds of tech bloggers are out there earning ad dollars on their highly niche sites.  According to Rafat Ali, editor and publisher of online media tracker PaidContent.org, "If Cisco has to spend, I don't know, a couple of million dollars on a trade campaign, they are not spending it with Red Herring or Business 2.0.” Rather, they are spending in on blogs who cover the sector.  

 

Not to mention, advertising on blogs costs less and blogs require less resources.  There is no overhead to maintain, no printing presses, less writers and even fewer editors.

 

A question that I frequently ponder in relation to the death of newspapers, and now with this talk of Business 2.0 going under, is why these publications don’t take their operations completely online.  Perhaps that is why I am also interested to see what Rupert Murdoch's plans are for the Wall Street Journal

 

I’m not saying that I think all publications should be based solely online.  Most people I know enjoy holding a print publication in their hands every now and then.  I personally enjoy perusing the photos in National Geographic.  Plus, if print went away completely, what would we look at in waiting rooms at the doctor’s office?  Surely, we don’t want to stare at each other.   

 

Faced with the impending death of a print magazine, however, why not take it completely online?  While bloggers have taken over the highly specialized categories, there are still people like me out there who enjoy reading, well, non-highly specialized articles on technology.  And I would much rather read about technology while using technology.  Business 2.0 isn’t exactly something I curl up with on the couch.  

 

So what do you think?  Will print publications really be around 20 years from now anyway?  Is the Web the way to go for Business 2.0? 



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (2)Add Comment
Bummer
written by bkostl, July 20, 2007 09:24 AM
Thanks. I hadn't heard the bad news yet. I've always liked Business 2.0, although I must admit it's been a while since I picked one up.

The NYT article seems to hit the nail on the head. It's a shame.
resources
written by tree hugger, July 20, 2007 09:26 AM
For conservation alone, I think print publications should turn digital. Yes, I agree that there is something wonderful about the experience of holding what I'm reading, but there's also something wonderful about living on a planet that can sustain life long-term. Enough with the wasted paper.
Most people I know get their news online now anyway, so I don't quite understand the hand wringing going on over at Business 2.0. And while we're on the subject of online media, can I just go off for a moment on the digital debacle that is the St. Louis Post-Dispatch web site? My God, it's just horrible. Always has been. Nothing ever loads. Why they can't take care of it is beyond me. Hate. Hate. HATE. OK, I'm done now.


Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy