Sugar, Salt, Fat and Kids PDF E-mail
Mary M. Phelan   
Thursday, 19 July 2007

 

Here’s the good news: It’s been announced that 11 major food marketers have now pledged to advertise only foods that meet certain nutritional standards to kids under 12.  They are Cadbury Adams, Campbell, Coca-Cola, General Mills, Hershey, Kellogg’s, Kraft, Mars, McDonald’s, Pepsi and Unilever.

 

Here’s the bad news:   Burger King, ConAgra, Nestle and Chuck E. Cheese aren’t among them.

 

Here’s the worst news:  Apparently all the companies will continue to advertise too-sweet, too-salty, too-fatty foods to kids and everyone else over 12.

 

Ok, ‘fess up—when was the last time you ate Cap’n Crunch, Trix or Chocolate Lucky Charms instead of plain old Wheaties for breakfast?  If you are under 50, it probably wasn’t very long ago, being as you’re the generation that fought with your mothers over buying sugar-coated cereals—and often won.  And henceforth, you have a yen for all that early morning sweetness.  And maybe you’re also battling the mid-life bulges that have built up over the years from eating habit-forming junk food.  A difficult challenge.  Or less euphemistically, a rotten problem.

 

So while we can congratulate the companies who appear to be doing some mea culpas for contributing to the country’s obesity epidemic, we can also ask:  Why are they stopping at 12 years old? 

 

But, then we ask ourselves that old free-to-be-me question:  Are food companies and marketers responsible for an individual’s obesity, or is each individual responsible for her/his own weight in life?  And we get the standard answer:  It’s obvious that only individuals can feed themselves—no company or marketer has been observed force-feeding Americans. 

 

But wait.  If companies didn’t think sugary, salty and fatty products would sell best, they wouldn’t produce them, would they?  And if marketers didn’t think their ads and promotions influenced people (no matter what age) to buy them, they wouldn’t be marketing them, would they?

 

Next time you are in a U.S. airport, mall, and yes, even a hospital corridor, watch America walk by.  And then ask yourself if stopping the bad ads at age 12 is enough to help stem the tide of obesity-related health problems looming on the horizon for so many, many children, adolescents and adults. 

 

So here’s a novel idea:  Companies could make a far greater difference by making their products nutritional for all ages, and then it’s a no-brainer for marketers to promote them.  Or is that asking too much?



Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!

Comments (8)Add Comment
For once... I can't complain.
written by Wet Blanket, July 19, 2007 02:44 PM
I'm always honking about some sign the End of Days is near, so I guess I need to (grudgingly) admit that this is a welcome and wonderful sign things might be getting better afterall. There's now pressure for Burger King and the gang to joing the crowd or lose market share. Could they do more? Of course. Could we have Sponge Bob green beans and Blues Clues canned carrots? Absolutely. Could some freaking company make fruit canned in water so I don't have to rinse the contents for twenty minutes to prevent my daughter from collapsing into a diabetic coma? Someone? Please?

Anyway, high fructose corn syrup aside, I applaud the effort, and hopefully we'll see more. The local grocery just discontinued the organic condiments we buy, so it's not all rosy out there, and while my m.o. is gloom, doom, and righteous indignation, I'll sit back for once and not ridicule the food companies for not doing more. Just this once.
A step in the right direction...
written by mmpeirce, July 19, 2007 03:34 PM
...but parents are still key in curbing this epidemic. Just say no.
You were set up, Cap'n
written by Toucan Sam, July 19, 2007 03:42 PM
Cut the roof of your mouth, no. Leave a film that won't leave for days, yes.

Oh, and this is very encouraging news. But as mmpeirce says, it's not the responsibility of food companies to keep our kids from becoming obese and diabetic...that's our job. Moderation, people. The occasional bowl of Trix isn't going to guarantee a pancreatic blowout anytime soon. Just don't mow through a case a week.
That's Balogna
written by Jesse, July 19, 2007 04:10 PM
Toucan, you oversimplified it. Saying food companies aren't responsible at all for supplying us with food that causes obesity and diabetes is silly. It's not ALL their fault- parents are a key player in establishing a balance. but they aren't blame-free. Are drug dealers faultless when a kid overdoses because parents should teach their kids to just say no, or at the very least to use drugs in moderation? How about those hot cheese snacks? Those things are proved to hook kids by causing a chemical high. Is that okay, as long as parents teach moderation!
It's not easy bein' cheesy
written by Wet Blanket, July 19, 2007 04:12 PM
I dunno Jes. I like flamin' hots. I'm an adult. Should I not be able to eat them, or should they be available over-the-counter? I'm fine blocking youth marketing, actually, but don't try to take my Flamin' Hots.
...
written by Margarita, July 19, 2007 05:16 PM
Uh, are we really comparing hot cheetos and food companies to heroin and drug dealers?
are they so different?
written by Jesse, July 19, 2007 05:20 PM
why don't you compare the numbers on which kills more people every year. why is heroin illegal? ever met a food addict?

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy