At Picnic I attended an interesting session called The City as an Interaction Platform that took this theme as its point of departure: Cities have always been about providing frameworks of services to improve the quality of life for residents and businesses. How will social networks, mobile devices, reactive environments, and cloud-based data services transform the experiences of living in cities in the coming years? What new municipal infrastructure will evolve to meet the needs of citizens looking for the type of real time information and configurability they have come to expect from Internet applications? It was interesting to see three completely different takes on these issues. First Ben Cerveny of Vurb sketched an optimistic view of the ’cloud city’ ñ a future scenario in which citizens could get easy access to urban informatics and use those as the foundation for a blossoming civil society. Greg Skibiski of Sense Networks provided another optimist vision ñ be it based on a different paradigm ñ in which urban computing is used as the base of offering ever more personalized information and localization services for urbanites. Adam Greenfield however argued that when taken up in a certain way, the rise of urban computing might do urban culture more harm than good. What is at stake, he argued, are some of the essences of urban culture.
strategicDecember 19, 2014
culturalDecember 19, 2014
creativeDecember 19, 2014
economicDecember 19, 2014
© 2014 Davis Brand Capital. All rights reserved.